Loading page...
Loading page...
The Productivity Ratio measures revenue generated per dollar of operating expense. Learn how to calculate, benchmark, and optimise organisational productivity across functions as you scale.
Join 200+ organizations scaling from chaos to clarity. Unsubscribe at any time.
Most startups track growth. Fewer track productivity.
The Productivity Ratio bridges that gap — it measures how much revenue your organisation generates for every dollar spent on operations.
It’s one of the most powerful metrics for understanding whether your team, systems, and spending are producing leverage or drag.
Definition:
Productivity Ratio = Revenue ÷ Operating Expenses
Ideal Range:
Recommended Playbook: Financial Planning & Budgeting
Every scaling business faces the same challenge: as headcount and costs grow, output often plateaus.
The Productivity Ratio answers a simple question — is your growth efficient?
It measures your operating leverage, showing how effectively your cost base translates into revenue.
When this ratio improves over time, you’re scaling with discipline. When it declines, you’re adding weight faster than muscle.
[Productivity Ratio](/glossary#productivity-ratio) = Total Revenue ÷ Total [Operating Expenses](/glossary#operating-expenses-opex)
If your company generated $10M in revenue and spent $8M in operating expenses:
[Productivity Ratio](/glossary#productivity-ratio) = 10 ÷ 8 = 1.25
This means every $1 in opex produced $1.25 in revenue — a healthy, scalable position.
| Stage | Typical Range | Efficient | World-Class |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seed | 0.5–0.8× | 0.8–1.0× | 1.0×+ |
| Series A | 0.8–1.1× | 1.0–1.2× | 1.3×+ |
| Series B | 1.0–1.3× | 1.3×+ | 1.5×+ |
| Growth (C+) | 1.2–1.6× | 1.6×+ | 2.0×+ |
High-growth SaaS companies often operate between 1.2–1.8×, reflecting balance between investment and revenue scalability.
| Metric | Focus | Relationship |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Efficiency | Expense leverage | Broader cost context |
| Revenue per Employee | Headcount leverage | Micro productivity |
| Burn Multiple | Growth efficiency | Capital usage |
| Rule of 40 | Profit + growth | Strategic performance |
Together, these metrics describe your financial maturity curve — the ability to grow faster than you spend.
Indicates growing leverage — your revenue is scaling faster than expenses.
Often the result of system maturity, automation, and leadership alignment.
Revenue and expenses rising in parallel — neutral scaling. Usually temporary during expansion or retooling phases.
Expenses outpacing revenue — a warning sign. May indicate over-hiring, inefficiency, or slowing sales velocity.
The trendline tells the real story, not the snapshot.
You can apply the same principle to individual teams for richer insight:
| Function | Ratio | Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Sales Efficiency | New ARR ÷ Sales & Marketing Spend | GTM productivity |
| R&D Productivity | ARR ÷ Engineering Headcount | Innovation leverage |
| Customer Success Efficiency | Net Retention ÷ CS Cost | Retention ROI |
| Finance & Ops Efficiency | Revenue ÷ G&A Spend | Operational backbone |
By measuring productivity within each department, you identify where leverage is building — or leaking.
Every role should map to a measurable objective linked to revenue or efficiency.
Tools and process design often provide better ROI than new headcount.
Audit your opex — where does each dollar drive measurable output?
Tie incentives to outcome metrics, not activity levels.
Fewer tools with higher utilisation improve both focus and ROI.
Both are “growing,” but only B is scaling.
Leverage, not headcount, creates sustainable performance.
Productivity must always be contextual — compare like-for-like across peers.
When you can grow output without growing spend proportionally, you’ve found true scalability.
Explore: Financial Planning & Budgeting
Compare: [Operating Efficiency](/benchmarks/operating-efficiency)
Assess: Strategic Planning Diagnostic
Ready to measure your organisational leverage? Take the free Founder Diagnostic.